Juniper JN0-694 - Enterprise Routing and Switching Support, Professional (JNCSP- ENT) Exam
Page: 3 / 11
Total 52 questions
Question #11 (Topic: )
You want to receive routes from a remote EBGP peer as shown in the exhibit. The remote
site has the same AS number as your own. You have successfully established the EBGP
peering, but are not receiving any routes.
Which BGP group configuration parameter will enable you to receive routes from the
remote EBGP peer?
[Juniper-JN0-694-6.1/Juniper-JN0-694-13_2.png]
site has the same AS number as your own. You have successfully established the EBGP
peering, but are not receiving any routes.
Which BGP group configuration parameter will enable you to receive routes from the
remote EBGP peer?
[Juniper-JN0-694-6.1/Juniper-JN0-694-13_2.png]
A. advertise-inactive
B. multipath
C. as-override
D. remove-private
Answer: C
Question #12 (Topic: )
You have configured OSPF between two routers and the adjacency is not coming up. You
confirm that the physical link between them is up and then run the commands shown in the
exhibit on both routers.
Which two configuration mistakes apply? (Choose two.)
[Juniper-JN0-694-6.1/Juniper-JN0-694-14_2.png]
confirm that the physical link between them is up and then run the commands shown in the
exhibit on both routers.
Which two configuration mistakes apply? (Choose two.)
[Juniper-JN0-694-6.1/Juniper-JN0-694-14_2.png]
A. The hello timer is mismatched.
B. The subnet is mismatched.
C. The DR ID is mismatched.
D. The area ID is mismatched.
Answer: A,D
Question #13 (Topic: )
-- Exhibit
[Juniper-JN0-694-6.1/Juniper-JN0-694-15_2.png]
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
You are asked to assist with a problem with a new EBGP peering between Site 1 and Site
2. Referring to the exhibit, Site 1 is not receiving the 100.100.0.0/16 routes from Site 2.
Which action will resolve the problem?
[Juniper-JN0-694-6.1/Juniper-JN0-694-15_2.png]
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
You are asked to assist with a problem with a new EBGP peering between Site 1 and Site
2. Referring to the exhibit, Site 1 is not receiving the 100.100.0.0/16 routes from Site 2.
Which action will resolve the problem?
A. Enable the advertise-inactive parameter for the EBGP peering.
B. Enable the as-override parameter for the EBGP peering.
C. Create an export policy to export the IBGP routes over the EBGP peering.
D. Create a next-hop-self policy and apply it as an export policy to the EBGP peering.
Answer: A
Question #14 (Topic: )
-- Exhibit --
policy-statement test_route_filter {
term 1 {
from {
route-filter 192.168.0.0/16 longer;
route-filter 192.168.1.0/24 longer {
metric 5;
accept;
route-filter 192.168.0.0/8 orlonger accept;
then {
metric 10;
accept;
term 2 {
then {
metric 20;
accept;
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
Given test route 192.168.1.0/24 and the configuration shown in the exhibit, what is the
expected result?
policy-statement test_route_filter {
term 1 {
from {
route-filter 192.168.0.0/16 longer;
route-filter 192.168.1.0/24 longer {
metric 5;
accept;
route-filter 192.168.0.0/8 orlonger accept;
then {
metric 10;
accept;
term 2 {
then {
metric 20;
accept;
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
Given test route 192.168.1.0/24 and the configuration shown in the exhibit, what is the
expected result?
A. accepted with metric of 5
B. accepted with metric of 10
C. accepted with metric of 20
D. rejected
Answer: C
Question #15 (Topic: )
Your Junos device is dropping certain traffic flows, while allowing other traffic flows to pass
through the device unaffected.
Which CoS component is causing this problem?
through the device unaffected.
Which CoS component is causing this problem?
A. BA classification
B. RED
C. MF classification
D. Rewrite rules
Answer: D
